Former Rapport editor shares his views on what we can publish
Updated | By Breakfast with Martin Bester
Former Editor-in-Chief of Rapport Tim du Plessis joined Martin Bester to talk about the matter of principle vs responsible reporting and censorship.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/371bc/371bc120e04b5c69616d388643945642a997c4a5" alt="Tim du Plessis"
Rugby legend James Small passed away recently. Controversial details emerged regarding his death, with the fact that he was found naked in a brothel after suffering a heart attack reported by mainstream media.
Photos also circulated on social media of Marc Batchelor, who was shot in his car.
Do we as the public have the right to this kind of detail or has the media gone too far? If we eliminate this detail, is that responsible reporting or the opposite?
ALSO READ: 'Will the new smoking laws be regulated?' - Martin Bester
Tim du Plessis joined Breakfast with Martin Bester to explain what we may and may not publish.
I hear people’s opinions about people’s private lives. You sacrifice a bit of your privacy once you are in the public eye.- Tim du Plessis, Head of Current Affairs at kykNET and former editor of Rapport
"When I was the editor of Rapport, this type of news was the food," Tim du Plessis said.
"Social media took over the mainstream industry - such as radio and newspapers. Radio and newspapers are very careful about what they write about people but not social media. I totally agree, we must respect people's privacy but when someone has a high profile, we must enter that privacy."
"Sharing inappropriate pictures and videos are not fair."
Show's Stories
-
List of 31st Screen Actors Guild Award winners
Here are the winners of the 31st Screen Actors Guild Awards.
Breakfast with Martin Bester 52 minutes ago -
Boredom isn't a good enough reason for unlimited screen time
Embracing boredom helped this young girl discover hidden talents she nev...
The Workzone with Elana Afrika-Bredenkamp an hour ago